Bear with me, friends. I came across something today that makes me want to rant my little blogger heart out. Probably I should calm down before I explain, or I will get a lot of you commenting, “Stop yelling at me! I didn’t do it!” So, for a few minutes, I’m going to tell you a story instead.
Years ago, when I was a teenager, my family moved from Northern California to Southern California. I didn’t enjoy it. For several months I wallowed in the unhappiness of my fate, doing nothing in particular to lift my own spirits. Needless to say, drenched in L’Essence de Despair, I had trouble finding anyone with whom I could eat lunch. My dad, having time mid-day and being a generally good guy, used to drive over to my high school once or twice a week and spring me from campus for half an hour. Sometimes we’d go down to McDonald’s, but generally, we’d just sit in the car in the parking lot, and I would eat whatever bag lunch I had brought that day. At some point, the dean called my dad in and informed him that I was only a sophomore, and that they reserved the privilege of leaving school during lunch for juniors and seniors, and that he really needed to quit pulling me out of school so that I would make some friends. My dad informed her that I was his daughter and he’d pull me out of school whenever he jolly well felt like it, thank you very much. (Probably not in those exact words, but the idea was the same.) I heard about this story afterwards. I got the dean’s point, and I think I tried a little harder to make friends after that. But even so, I really loved my dad for telling the dean to back off, and letting it be my choice to try harder.
I told this story to Ann and Diana this past week. Ann, who’s met my dad on several occasions, sighed and said, “The thing about your dad is that he would tell them that without even raising his voice, so they couldn’t really say anything in response. How do you come back at someone who isn’t arguing with you?”
For the rest of this post, I am going to try as hard as I can to channel my dad’s calm energy. It’s going to take some doing, because I have all the provocation I need to post paragraph upon paragraph of ranting. I could write in all caps with a lot of exclamation points. But instead, I will try to say calmly what I want to say.
America, I thought we covered this in kindergarten, but evidently it bears repeating – we must learn to share.
(See? Wasn’t that calm? Okay, one little case of italics there at the end, but that was it.)
Now you’d probably like to know what set me off. Okay, here goes. I saw a note today from a former theater teacher, advertising an auction. Why is he having an auction, you might wonder? To get rid of extra stuff around the house? To kick-start a vacation fund? Maybe, since you read the word “theater” up there, you might assume it was to fund a new production he’s working on. You’d be perfectly reasonable guessing any of these things. But you’d be wrong.
Some friends of his family put together this auction in order to help out with his one-year-old son’s medical bills.
First, let me give those amazing friends a pat on the back and as big a plug as I can. You can check out the auction by clicking here or by going on Facebook and looking up Help Charlie Heal. (Fair warning, some of the stuff up for auction is seriously cute. Snugglable stuffed lion with scent-pack insert? Custom tooth fairy pillow? Yoda and Darth Vader cupcakes for your kid’s birthday party? All there.) You can bid until midnight, July 3. In case the auction is closed by the time you read this, you can still donate by logging on to www.charliesfund.blogspot.com.
Okay. Now I will take another breath of Dad-like mellowness and continue.
Really, America? Is this who we are? We sit around and debate whether or not it’s okay to take those tax breaks back – you know, the ones that were always supposed to be temporary – and completely ignore families trying to find a way to pay for their children’s medical care? This, I should add, is a family with insurance. You know, that fabulous thing that people across the country were so desperate not to have to give up for socialized medicine? Sweet baby Charlie – I defy you to look at that face and not smile – has to have surgery in August. His doctor prescribed weekly injections of a medicine designed to raise his red-blood cell count. Blue Cross/Blue Shield initially denied payment for it, but after a battle graciously agreed to pay for 70%. Good. Now the family only has to come up with 30% while they worry about surgery on their son’s skull. (And doubtless, how to pay for 30% of that.)
In the 2010 elections, the Tea Party sounded their great rallying cry, “I want my country back.”  Back the way it was at some earlier point, maybe – they never really clarified that. Well, you know what? I don’t want my country back the way it was. I want my country better than it was before. I want to live in an America that cares about its children. Not just enough to spout pablum about them on the campaign trail, but enough to put actual dollars towards their well-being. I want insurance that does its job and pays for crises when they arise, instead of the variety currently available, which spends 30% of its budget on overhead, including finding ways to deny 22% of claims. (See article here.)
(Sorry about that, Dad. I’m calming down now.)
I don’t enjoy paying taxes any more than anyone else does. I wish that all things could, like making friends in high school, be my own choice. But part of being in a society – great or otherwise – means pooling our resources, so that all of us can live a little better. It means putting up with the idea that sometimes things happen, and we will not see the benefit of them personally. But it’s okay, because our society is a better place for it.
My vision for our country is that one day, when a sick one-year-old is brought to a hospital, it gets whatever it needs, no questions asked. I don’t care whether it has insurance, or where it was born, or how its distress was brought about. Because the one thing I am absolutely certain of? Whatever the issues involved, the one-year-old is not to blame.
I know that whenever you try to do something good like this, someone will take advantage of it. But does that mean we should stop trying to do anything generous, and spend our whole lives watching our back (and our wallets)? Honestly, I just don’t want to be that kind of person. I want to try to make the world a better place. If someone takes advantage, well, that gets added to their bad karma, not mine. On occasion, I can’t help, and I have to pray that God will take care of the situation I can’t fix. (Got thunked on the head with that one rather recently. Maybe I’ll discuss it in a future post – when the emotional goose-egg has had time to heal.) Shouldn’t the reverse hold true? If I can fix something, and people take advantage, maybe I can trust God to sort them out, too.
Trust me, I know I’m not thinking perfectly rationally about this. I often don’t, when children are involved. (Or animals. Just want to warn you, in case that comes up in a future post.) But I keep flashing back to that story with my dad and the dean. I talked to the dean once that year, that I can remember. (It was a hi-and-welcome session when my parents first brought me to the school to enroll. The dean looked at my tall frame and said the school had an excellent girls’ volleyball team – basketball team? something like that. I wanted to tell her that if they were going to stay excellent, they needed to keep me far away from them, but I believe I refrained.) The dean knew the rules of the school. But my dad knew me. He knew that I just needed time to deal with my own stuff, and I’d find my way. The insurance company knows procedure, and they know profit. (In California alone, Blue Cross/Blue Shield made $565 million of profit in 2010. Not income – profit.) But they don’t know Charlie. His doctor does. BC/BS can check the doctor out, make sure there aren’t any complaints against him, ask to see his books. That’s their job. But until they find misdeeds, they should let the doctor make the decisions about this little boy’s care.
I can’t tell Blue Cross/Blue Shield or the many companies within it to give up making a profit. They’re companies. It’s what they do. But this is why I get so irritated with the Supreme Court for telling me that corporations should be treated like people. Corporations are not people. They don’t see right and wrong. They see profit and no-profit. All they know how to do is take. People, on the other hand, know how to share. (Whether they do or not, they know how.) People should know when it’s time to be happy with $400 million in profit, so that they can give the rest of the money to little kids who need some help to get better.
Forgive me, folks. (And Dad.) I’ve ranted here, even though I tried not to. I realize that there are no magic fixes to our health care system, or to any of the other problems in the world. But maybe learning to share would be a good place to start.
Look on the bright side. If we pass the basic Sharing refresher course, maybe we can bring back the other, more fun parts of kindergarten, like Napping, or Milk & Cookies.
Kimberly thanks God for giving her a dad who has advanced degrees in Sharing and Milk & Cookies. She’s glad God gave Charlie a pretty awesome dad, too.
Great rant, Kim. The world needs all kinds of people, the calm, rational folks and the firebrands. You rant all you want!!!
Medical insurance is one of my sore spots as well. The way we do it in this country is really stupid and it irritates me no end that there are enough selfish, stupid saps to stand in the way of changing it for the better.
My prayers are with Charlie.
The problem with this rant, is that is based on an emotional appeal. Like the ads of starving children in distant lands, loss and pain are irrefutable evils, we can all agree that no one wishes to suffer them.
The rub for me, the intellectual fallacy, is that such appeals are no different than the angry nationalistic jingoism we observe in times of economic struggle or social unrest. Don’t you want your country to be safe? Don’t you love your country?
You see the analog of course. Don’t you want your children to be cared for? Don’t you love your children? It’s for the children, after all.
Such frothy emotional appeal does little to advance the discussion of the proper allocation of resources to best suit our needs as a society. Those who hear such an appeal are impassioned and will brook no compromise, those who do not take offense at the emotional manipulation present, and perhaps they should. In either case, solutions are not advanced.
As a species, the one thing we are not short on is headcount. Our needs exceed our resources, and when the music stops, we are several million chairs short. Is it fair that some, that MANY go without, while others enjoy the best medicines available? It is not, of course, but then, the fair is in Pomona. Every sick person cannot have the best care available. If we allocate our resources to ensure equal treatment across economic and social lines, the highest standards, the peaks of our medical advancement must give way to a lower, more broadly available standard of care. Then who dies at the top? What cutting edge treatments are lost, or never developed, while our medical resources exhaust themselves providing a base level of care worldwide. A few CEO’s? The fabulously wealthy? Perhaps not… perhaps those lost are also our friends and neighbors who have become accustomed to a standard of care that many in the world cannot dream of. Even Charlie, could be lost from the top of the pile to spread the footprint at the bottom, to extend “quality, affordable medical care to all.”.
We all wish that our friends and family, children most especially, would not get sick, would not die. Wishing does not make it so, and sympathetic media-friendly causes do not create resources, only divisions.
-RS
Gosh, I LOVE your blogs Kim. You really are a talented writer as far as I am concerned. You certainly write with a style that catches my attention immediately. I have just spent nearly an hour on Charlie’s website and what a travesty our insurance situation is. Yes, rant, rant, RANT!! I will follow Charlie through his surgery next month. Thanks for caring so much. And, thanks for letting me read and enjoy your writing.
Holly and the boys will be here at the weekend. I can’t wait to see them. I am SO blessed to have a “Holly” in my life and call her daughter. (Bet your mom is too!)
Thank you! I am sure Holly feels just as lucky to be able to go home to her mom as I do when I go home to mine for a few days. Hope you guys have a great visit, and take lots of pictures!
@Rob – The problem with your argument is that it is an “appeal to fear”. You are suggesting that if we regulate healthcare so that healthcare companies are actually forced to provide healthcare, that somebody, somewhere (maybe even you!) will suffer dreadful consequences. As if that is some sort of inevitability.
You seem to be asserting that by switching to a more comprehensive and regulated healthcare system we will drain the funding from research in important fields such as fighting cancer, AIDS, Alzheimer’s, and Parkinson’s. Do you have any facts to support this?
The US is the only first world nation that does not have Universal Healthcare. According to the World Health Organization, “The U.S. health system spends a higher portion of its gross domestic product than any other country but ranks 37 out of 191 countries according to its performance.” That means that 36 other countries are spending less money and getting better healthcare. If we were to learn from those who are more efficient, we would have MORE money for research, not less!
We are living in a country where people go without proper care all the time, and it is not because our resources are exhausted. It’s because it is more profitable for a corporation to take premiums and give nothing in return.
One last thing: Logical fallacies like “Appeal to Emotion” do not make the overall argument invalid, and they do not make facts into lies. The argument is only invalid if the facts do not support the emotional appeal. If you have any facts to support your assertions, I suggest you include them along with your logical fallacy.
For the love of God, keep writing these airctels.